Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Fight Against Crime

Spread the love

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning within the Fight Against Financial Crime

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Fight Against Crime
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Fight Against Crime


The fight against concealment may be a huge challenge for Financial Crime  institutions round the world, and as criminal methodologies grow more sophisticated, so must the AML measures put in situ to prevent them. Since modern AML requires firms to affect vast amounts of complex customer data, many are turning to technology, specifically Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) systems, to assist them detect concealment activities and satisfy their evolving compliance obligations.

Artificial Intelligence holds such promise as an AML tool because it not only performs AML tasks faster than a person’s compliance employee but, via machine learning, has the potential to adapt to new threats and new concealment methodologies, ensuring that firms are ready to re-position quickly in several regulatory environments and stay one step before the criminals.
The practical advantages of ML and Artificial Intelligence concealment tools to an AML program are as follows:

Changes in Behavior: Financial Crime

When customers’ transaction data is inputted into an AML program, machine learning models can analyze that behavior to form predictions and judgments that customer within the future. More specifically, with the advantage of ML, an AML system could become sensitive to changes in behavior, however subtle, that conventional AML checks might miss. Those deviations from the norm would represent a replacement set of knowledge inputs that would , in turn, be analyzed by an Artificial Intelligence algorithm to work out whether a suspicious activity report (SAR) is warranted.

Customer Insights:

Automated AI systems allow the CDD and Know Your Customer (KYC) processes to require place faster and with greater depth and scope. the standard and quantity of Artificial Intelligence-enhanced CDD will give compliance employees a greater range of relevant AML data which will be wont to inform risk assessments, suspicious activity reports and subsequent investigations. in additional detail, the CDD and KYC applications of Artificial Intelligence will allow firms to:

Efficiently collect identifying data from a greater range of external sources, including sanctions lists and watch lists, so as to construct a more accurate customer risk profile.
Identify beneficial owners of customer entities within the same manner, using external data faster and more efficiently.
Aggregate and reconcile customer data across internal systems to eliminate duplication and errors and enhance the consistency of AML measures between customers.
Automatically enrich suspicious activity reports with relevant data from customer risk profiles or data from external sources.


Unstructured Data:

Beyond building customer risk profiles, AML compliance requires the analysis of unstructured data as a part of transaction monitoring, PEP screening, sanctions screening and adverse media monitoring processes. so as to properly assess the danger those customers present, firms must plan to use that data to know their social, professional and political lives, examining a variety of external sources, including media and public archives, social networks and other relevant datasets.

AI systems help firms manage and analyze that unstructured data during a way that enhances AML compliance. In practice, meaning running AI-assisted customer name searches against vast amounts of external data and finding matches, patterns and connections that might be missed by other sorts of conventional analysis. Once the info is collected and analyzed, Artificial Intelligence can help firms prioritize and categorize information to assist risk management.

Suspicious Activity Reporting:

Artificial intelligence can aid suspicious activity reporting (SAR) by not only generating reports automatically but automatically filling them out with relevant information. before their submission to the authorities, SARs often undergo an indoor reporting process with contributions from numerous AML employees and senior management. the interior process may even require the submission of knowledge from different parts of the planet and in several languages.

Artificial Intelligence technology are often wont to make the SAR process easier: algorithms can pre-populate automated reports with relevant data and present that data with accessible, standardized language and terminology so as to attenuate bureaucratic friction and ensure consistency for each contributor. By standardizing language and terminology, then increasing the narrative specialise in regulation, AI can’t only increase the speed and efficiency of a firm’s AML reporting, but also its impact in subsequent investigations by authorities.

Reducing Noise:

The principal advantage of technological automation within an AML system is to feature speed and efficiency to otherwise complex and time-consuming compliance procedures. However, one among the main obstacles to compliance efficiency, even in an era when technology allows firms to perform AML with greater speed, is that the level of noise, or false positives, that result from incomplete or inadequate data and therefore the over-sensitivity of AML measures.

In practice, because of false positives, only a fraction of AML alerts reach become full SARs: a rate that suggests a high degree of wasted time, money and resources. thereupon in mind, AI and ML systems promise a big transformative effect to the extent of noise generated during the AML process: Artificial Intelligence can help firms generate much richer insight into customers and transaction patterns, allowing them to eliminate incorrect and irrelevant alerts that make the compliance process so costly for firms and onerous for patrons . Practically, those applications include:

Semantic analysis of alerts to spot those created by redundant data.
Statistical analysis of high-risk customers and transactions to differentiate true positives from false positives.
Intuitive screening during sanctions, PEP and adverse media checks to eliminate mistakes and false positives generated by regional naming conventions.
Prioritization of upper risk customers during the transaction monitoring process.

It’s worth bearing in mind that the strengthening relationship between AI and financial crime compliance won’t eliminate the necessity for human AML teams or the event of risk-based AML programs specific to their environments. By reducing noise, Artificial Intelligence and machine learning tools allow AML employees to raised prioritize and address the foremost urgent concealment alerts with the advantage of human experience and expertise and, in doing so, more effectively contribute to the fight against financial crime.

Leave a Comment

%d bloggers like this: